Why we decouple price from hours.

The problem with a day rate on automation work

A day rate rewards slowness. If we bill by the hour, the fastest possible delivery of a workflow is the worst outcome for our revenue — which is exactly backwards from what you are paying for. You are not buying our time; you are buying the removal of a specific, measurable cost: hours of manual re-keying, error correction, or delay that a workflow eliminates every week, indefinitely, after we leave.

So we price against that outcome instead.

How the fee is actually sized

We size the fixed fee against a conservative estimate of that combined value, then quote it upfront — the same closed-price discipline as every other Numerimondes service.

Why speed is a real advantage here, not a shortcut

We build with no-code and low-code blocks, automation-workflow platforms, and language models wherever they let us assemble a tailored solution fast. That is not corner-cutting — for a well-scoped, single-purpose workflow (a quote generator, an invoice extractor), a from-scratch custom build is usually the wrong tool: slower to ship and more expensive to maintain than it needs to be.

This is what lets us commit to delivery timelines meaningfully shorter than a traditional development agency, while still handing you something you own and can extend without calling us for every change.

Where this stops applying

Value-based pricing works when the outcome is measurable and the scope is a defined process. It stops being the right model once a project becomes a genuinely open-ended custom build — at that point, the engagement is Development work, priced by scoped milestones instead.

Next step